The Caped Crusader Through the Ages
By Chris Sabga
It's official:
Ben
Affleck is the new Batman! Based on the nuclear reaction, you'd think the
world has gone up in flames.
Gotham
City may have though.
Affleck is a great director and a decent actor, but I'm
having a very hard time picturing him as Batman. After all, his last foray as a
superhero – in 2003's "Daredevil" – wasn't exactly a success.
Daredevil is an incredible character – a blind man who uses his disabilities to
his advantage – but the film was as mediocre and mundane as they come. Affleck
certainly doesn't deserve all of the
blame for that, but nothing about his performance as Daredevil convinced me
that he could tackle the role of the even more iconic Batman.
Bruce Wayne, yes. Batman, no.
Affleck certainly has the looks and charm to portray the
billionaire playboy Bruce Wayne, but the daring, deadly Dark Knight is another
story entirely. In that regard, Affleck seems like another George Clooney
(1997's "Batman & Robin").
Clooney has repeatedly poked fun at himself for one of the
biggest disasters of his career. It's clear that Affleck either didn't seek his
advice or chose to ignore it. I can only hope this isn't just a "paycheck
role" for Affleck. That would be doing the character and franchise a great
disservice.
Reportedly, Affleck's Batman will be an older, wiser,
grizzled veteran to Henry Cavill's Superman. There's only one problem with
that: Despite an eleven-year age difference, Affleck doesn't look any older than Cavill. Of
course, that's nothing a little makeup and hair-dye can't take care of.
Truthfully, I like Ben Affleck, and I'm rooting for him to
surprise us all. In order for that to happen though, he is going to have to
learn from history. Seven other men put on the cape and cowl before him for
live action adaptations of "Batman."
Lewis G. Wilson:
Batman (1943 – Serial)
Robert Lowery: Batman
and Robin (1949 – Serial)
Raise your hand if you thought Adam West was the first actor
to portray Batman on-screen. I certainly did. But two others came before him:
Lewis G. Wilson was the first Caped Crusader in 1943, and Robert Lowery
followed in his footsteps six years later in 1949. Both serials are readily
available on DVD, and episodes can also be found on YouTube.
Adam West: Batman
(1966-1968 – TV Series), Batman (1966 – Movie)
Fun, outrageous, and completely campy – Adam West's Batman
was a cartoon come-to-life. Generations of Bat-fans grew up on West's version,
and it remains just as beloved today as it was when it first aired all the way
back in 1966. For over 30 years, West's zany take on Batman was the most famous
televised version of the character. But the door was definitely open for a more
serious interpretation of the Caped Crusader. That finally happened in 1989.
Michael Keaton: Batman
(1989), Batman Returns (1992)
At the time, people must have had serious doubts about
Keaton's ability to become Batman. On paper, it seems like something that
shouldn't have worked at all. By all appearances, Keaton wasn't suave enough to
be Bruce or tough enough to be Batman – and yet, somehow, he pulled it off
spectacularly. Perhaps the same will be true of Affleck? It helps, of course,
that everything else was so perfectly realized.
Gotham City
came alive – transformed into a dark, atmospheric, stunning metropolis for this
movie. Jack Nicholson was brilliant and manic as The Joker; funny, serious, and
downright creepy – often all three at the same time. And all of Batman's amazing
"toys" – such as the Batmobile – completed the effect. But none of
that would have mattered if Keaton himself wasn't equipped for the task. The
sequel, "Batman Returns," wasn't nearly as good, but Keaton remains
one of the best to ever wear the cape and cowl.
Val Kilmer: Batman
Forever (1995)
If Adam West's Batman had a baby with Keaton's and then
they performed an abortion, you might get something like "Batman
Forever." Val Kilmer was hardly an extraordinary Bruce Wayne or a great
Batman, the villains are barely memorable (Jim Carrey's version of The Riddler
has nothing on Frank Gorshin), and the movie is so garish and off-the-rails.
Despite all of that, I have a soft spot for it anyway. It's a mess, but an
endearing one – to me at least. The same, however, cannot be said for the film
that put the Batman franchise on ice for almost a decade.
George Clooney: Batman
& Robin (1997)
Where to begin with this wretched train-wreck of a movie? Clooney
is an adequate
Wayne
but can't pull off Batman at all. I fear the same fate will befall Ben Affleck.
But at least Affleck won't have to contend with Bat-nipples. Clooney's suit was
designed with this "effect" presumably to enhance his "sex
appeal," but all it did was make him look like a cloaked clown. Arnold
Schwarzenegger is absolutely abysmal as Mr. Freeze – the less said, the better.
Neither of their careers took a hit, but Batman retreated to the Batcave until
2005.
Christian Bale: Batman
Begins (2005), The Dark Knight (2008), The Dark Knight Rises (2012)
Just as a darker tone was necessary for 1989's
"Batman," the same was true when Christopher Nolan was tasked with
rebooting the franchise for 2005's "Batman Begins." Over the course
of three movies, Nolan and star Christian Bale never wavered from bringing a
grittier, more true-to-life Batman to the screen. Instead of a campy Sunday
morning strip like the Adam West TV version or a live action comic book like
Keaton's 1989 film, this was a far more plausible, down to earth, serious take
on Batman.
Gotham
City finally looked like
a real city that real people could live in.
After three exhausting mega-blockbusters, Christian Bale has
understandably decided to move on. That brings us back to the current situation
– to Ben Affleck.
Ben Affleck: Batman vs. Superman –
AKA Man of Steel 2 (2015)
Affleck does have a few major elements working in his favor:
Unlike the other seven Batmen who have preceded him, he does
not have to carry an entire TV show or film all by himself – "Superman"
Henry Cavill will be sharing the load.
Superman and Batman appearing together in the same movie is
a massive event. That "gimmick" alone will alleviate some of the
pressure from Affleck – much like Mark Ruffalo had an easier time stepping in
for Edward Norton as Bruce Banner in "The Avengers" because he had to
share the screen with so many others.
Because the movie will not be focused solely on Batman, the
man behind the mask isn't quite as
important as it normally would be. That doesn't mean Carrot Top could suddenly
play Batman and all would be well, but even if Affleck is ill-suited to the
role, he is by no means a bad actor.
Still, I'm skeptical and wary. I can't help but think that
there were better options available.
Even Affleck's best friend, Matt Damon, would have been
preferable – not ideal either, necessarily, but I can sort of picture it.
Since the character is supposed to skew a bit older, my
dream pick: Daniel Day-Lewis. There was probably no chance in hell of that happening, but you know you want to
see it!
Out of the plausible candidates available, it's hard to
really say. Mel Gibson is probably too old now – and he's box office poison for
obvious reasons – but he wouldn't be bad, talent-wise. If his Bat-suit had
nipples, would they be
sugar
tits?
Casting a virtual unknown or respected foreign actor – similar
to Henry Cavill in "Man of Steel" – might have been the best bet. But
since I'd personally want an American actor to play Batman again (I realize neither Gibson or Day-Lewis fit the bill in that regard, but they can pull off the accent convincingly), I'm forced to
admit that there aren't too many viable candidates for the role.
If I'm backed against a corner and
have to pick someone right now, I'll go with Liev Schreiber.
He's dapper enough to pull off Bruce Wayne and more than tough enough to stalk
the streets as Batman.